How are reasoning processes shaped by the heuristic system and analytic system? In the present study, we were focused on how heuristics and analytical thinking affect reasoning. According to dual-process theories, reasoning consists of two distinct modes of processing: System 1 and System 2. System 1 generates responses that are automatic, fast, and intuitive. This system does not need working memory resources. The other system is reflective. Characteristics of this system are deliberative, slow, and conscious. System 2 depends on working memory capacity. Therefore, system 2 needs working memory resources. In the present study, the experimental design was as follows: All participants performed randomly distributed modified version of the bat and ball problems and the syllogistic reasoning problems while they kept memory load in mind and had a time limit in the initial response stage. Then the questions were asked again without memory load and deadline. Both tasks consist of conflict (experiment questions) and no-conflict (control questions) questions. Whereas participants chose among four options in a modified version of the bat and ball problems, they chose between yes and no, considering two premises and a conclusion in the syllogistic reasoning problems. A two-response paradigm was applied. The problems were asked twice. In the first presentation of the problems, we occupied the participant’s working memory with a dual task procedure and time pressure. We replicated the common implication of system 1 with fast response and system 2 with slow thinking.
Yazar |
Saban, Sara Gültekin, Burak Berk |
Yayın Türü | Preprint |
Tek Biçim Adres | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11831/7970 |
Konu Başlıkları |
Analytic system
Conflict detection Dual process of thinking Heuristics and biases Reasoning Two response paradigm Working memory |
Koleksiyonlar |
Ön Baskı Yayınlar |
Sayfalar | - |
Yayın Tarihi | 2022 |
Eser Adı [dc.title] | Examining Heuristic-System 1 and Analytic-System 2 Processing During Reasoning on the Syllogisms and the Modified Version of the Bat and Ball Problems: Response Time, Response Confidence, and Dual-Task Assessments |
Yazar [dc.contributor.author] | Saban, Sara |
Yazar [dc.contributor.author] | Gültekin, Burak Berk |
Yayıncı [dc.publisher] | Yeditepe University Academic and Open Access Information System |
Yayın Türü [dc.type] | preprint |
Açıklama [dc.description] | Note: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field |
Özet [dc.description.abstract] | How are reasoning processes shaped by the heuristic system and analytic system? In the present study, we were focused on how heuristics and analytical thinking affect reasoning. According to dual-process theories, reasoning consists of two distinct modes of processing: System 1 and System 2. System 1 generates responses that are automatic, fast, and intuitive. This system does not need working memory resources. The other system is reflective. Characteristics of this system are deliberative, slow, and conscious. System 2 depends on working memory capacity. Therefore, system 2 needs working memory resources. In the present study, the experimental design was as follows: All participants performed randomly distributed modified version of the bat and ball problems and the syllogistic reasoning problems while they kept memory load in mind and had a time limit in the initial response stage. Then the questions were asked again without memory load and deadline. Both tasks consist of conflict (experiment questions) and no-conflict (control questions) questions. Whereas participants chose among four options in a modified version of the bat and ball problems, they chose between yes and no, considering two premises and a conclusion in the syllogistic reasoning problems. A two-response paradigm was applied. The problems were asked twice. In the first presentation of the problems, we occupied the participant’s working memory with a dual task procedure and time pressure. We replicated the common implication of system 1 with fast response and system 2 with slow thinking. |
Kayıt Giriş Tarihi [dc.date.accessioned] | 2022-09-21 |
Yayın Tarihi [dc.date.issued] | 2022 |
Açık Erişim Tarihi [dc.date.available] | 2022-09-21 |
Dil [dc.language.iso] | eng |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Analytic system |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Conflict detection |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Dual process of thinking |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Heuristics and biases |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Reasoning |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Two response paradigm |
Konu Başlıkları [dc.subject] | Working memory |
Haklar [dc.rights] | Yeditepe University Academic and Open Access Information System |
Yazar Departmanı [dc.contributor.department] | Yeditepe University Graduate School of Natural And Applied Sciences |
Yazar Departmanı [dc.contributor.department] | Yeditepe University Graduate School of Natural And Applied Sciences Master’s Program in Cognitive Science |
Tek Biçim Adres [dc.identifier.uri] | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11831/7970 |